The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham have produced an Air Quality Action Plan which is now open to public consultation. In summary, their proposals include:
- Launching an electric vehicle hiring scheme – with a year’s free membership for local people,
- Encouraging people to use electric vehicles by extending their network of charging bays,
- Fining drivers who leave their engines running unnecessarily
- Becoming the leading cycle-friendly borough in London with cycle quietways, cycle storage and cycle superhighways,
- Encouraging more walking by tackling congestion, traffic speeds and by providing more greenery,
- Reducing fossil-fuel boilers by replacing them with ultra-low nitrogen oxide boilers and ensuring energy plants are regulated through the planning process.
Not too many surprises there apart from the last one perhaps. But in the detail of the plan there is some surprising information. For example, it shows that as regards the impact of road transport on PM10, some 76% of them come from tyre and brake wear rather than engine tailpipe emissions.
Even more noteworthy is a statement on page 13 that they estimate that by 2020 emissions from road transport will reduce so much that it is projected that domestic and commercial gas sources will become the largest contributor of NOX in the borough, relegating transport to second place.
So will Mayor Sadiq Khan penalise inefficient and older heating boilers soon by forcing users to upgrade them, or imposing “emission charges” on them in the same way he has done for older car users?
It would be rational if he did, and clearly much more needs to be done to suppress dust on London’s streets. It was interesting watching an old film recently on television, the Blue Lamp, set in 1950, which showed water being sprayed from tankers to do just that. Perhaps we should reintroduce them. Other European cities use them. Or are they already being used in London but I don’t get up early enough to see them?
The H&F Draft Action Plan can be read here: https://www.lbhf.gov.uk/sites/default/files/section_attachments/hf_draft_air_quality_action_plan_2018-2023.pdf
Local residents should submit some comments.
What’s the impact of putting up 20MPH speed limit signs? Minimal according to a report from the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham. A report on traffic speeds after the introduction of wide-area 20 mph speed limits comparing measured traffic speeds in 2015 and 2017 showed an average reduction of just 1.3%.
Across 100 comparable roads, the 85th percentile reduced from 24.83 mph to 24.52 mph. Although some roads showed bigger reductions in speed, others actually showed substantial increases. But the data is difficult to interpret because those with the highest increases reported low speeds in 2015 while those with the biggest reductions reported high speeds in 2015. It’s possible these are statistical anomalies resulting from inadequate sample sizes.
Is there any data on accident impact? Too early to report apparently. But the Council is pushing ahead regardless with extending 20mph to all remaining side roads in the borough and on some sections of main roads.
You can read the H&F report here: http://democracy.lbhf.gov.uk/documents/s93226/20MPH%20Speed%20Limit%20-%20Speed%20Surveys%20Results.pdf
Comment: This surely demonstrates that the likely benefits of such schemes do not justify the cost. The money would be much better spent on other road safety measures.
The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham are proposing to implement a wide-area 20-mph speed limit across all of the borough with only a few exceptions. This was introduced on an experimental basis but is now being made permanent unless enough people object.
So residents or anyone affected by this proposal need to object as soon as possible. The latest day to do so is the 4th of March so please submit objections saying you would like it scrapped.
See here for more information on how to object: http://www.fairdealforthemotorist.org.uk/object20mph.htm
The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham is proposing to introduce a borough-wide 20mph zone. The only exceptions will be two Transport for London (TfL) controlled roads – the A4 Great West Rd/Talgarth Rd and the A40 Westway/Western Ave.
If you live in or work in the borough, please respond by the 31st July to oppose the proposal.
The following page links to the council’s very one-sided consultation document and some counter-arguments, and has a link for responding online: http://www.fairdealforthemotorist.org.uk/saferhandf.htm
(Please pass it on to anyone you know who might be able to respond).
If you are just an occasional visitor to the borough (e.g. to Chelsea FC, the Queens Club (tennis), the Hammersmith Apollo theatre or Olympia), you can still email a personal objection to firstname.lastname@example.org.